Skip to main content

Taking Your Trading to the Next Level

Friday was an interesting day for me in the market.  It captured a lot of what I've been doing right as a trader and a lot of what I still need to accomplish.  As I shared with several colleagues, my cycle work has been looking toppy.  During the recent market strength, sector participation has been uneven.  Yield-sensitive shares have rocketed to new highs, while many others have lagged.  Banking shares, in particular, have looked weak.  All of that meant that I went into the day leaning to the short side.  Given an important jobs number coming out, however, I took no position into the event.  The number was uber-strong, the market rocketed higher, and trended higher for most the session.

In the past, I would have traded my bearish view, hit my stop, and taken my loss.  In my recent trading, I don't take a trade unless everything lines up.  The tape action contradicted my cycle view and I stood aside before the number--and after the number.  I never traded.  I finished the week at my high water mark for the year.  By trading super-selectively, I've sustained a high hit rate and a high Sharpe ratio.  The average daily volatility of my P/L, however, is quite low.  By waiting for everything to line up, I'm making money when I play and I'm not playing all that much.

Early in the day on Friday, after the release of the number, I said to myself that we have a potential trend day in play.  Buying early weakness was a good trade, albeit not the great trade that I've looked for in waiting for everything to line up.  By not taking good trades and only taking the great ones, I've been maximizing my risk-adjusted returns (how much I make per unit of risk taken), but leaving a lot of absolute returns on the table.

Friday was a nice illustration of how I've become a good trader--and how far I need to go to become a great one.  But taking trading to the next level means the trading ship has to leave the safe harbor.  In my case, it means moving out of the comfort zone of trades where all lines up to take trades with solid, but more uncertain odds.  From the weight room to the trading room, all growth occurs by pushing the limits of comfort.

There are a few worthwhile takeaways from this reflection on performance:

*  You can't improve your performance if you don't understand your performance - I can quote my P/L, average drawdown size, hit rate, Sharpe ratio, average daily P/L volatility, etc. at the drop of a hat.  The performance stats don't lie.  I'm either getting better or worse, doing things right or wrong.  Having detailed performance stats allows me to have a detailed understanding of performance.  The trader with few trades, a good hit rate on trades, but negative P/L has a very different problem from the trader who has many trades, a poor hit rate, and the same P/L.  If you don't keep score, you can't improve your score.  

*  Qualitative information counts as well - Sometimes the best information comes from trades not taken and decisions not made.  Those won't directly show up in performance stats, but may be essential to understanding our strengths and weaknesses.  Friday's non-trading, for me, carries a lot of information, but won't stand out in my end-of-month or end-of-year stats.

*  A great deal of information can be gleaned within performance curves - When in the past 12 months have we traded best?  Worst?  What were the market conditions at those times?  What specific things were we doing right?  Wrong?  Sometimes, in playing to our strengths, we create new vulnerabilities.  What I've done well in trading is take the drama out.  Drawdowns have been limited; the P/L has ground higher.  In taking the drama out, however, I've created a new comfort zone.  The shape of our performance curves invariably tell an important story.

The bottom line is that coach is a verb, not a noun.  It's something we must do, not a person we hire.  If we are to reach our performance potential, we must be both coach and performer, studying ourselves as intensively as we study markets.

Further Reading:  Becoming Your Own Trading Coach
.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Benefits Of Healthy eating Turmeric every day for the body

One teaspoon of turmeric a day to prevent inflammation, accumulation of toxins, pain, and the outbreak of cancer.  Yes, turmeric has been known since 2.5 centuries ago in India, as a plant anti-inflammatory / inflammatory, anti-bacterial, and also have a good detox properties, now proven to prevent Alzheimer's disease and cancer. Turmeric prevents inflammation:  For people who

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that

Not a word was spoken (but many were learned)

Video is often used in the EFL classroom for listening comprehension activities, facilitating discussions and, of course, language work. But how can you exploit silent films without any language in them? Since developing learners' linguistic resources should be our primary goal (well, at least the blogger behind the blog thinks so), here are four suggestions on how language (grammar and vocabulary) can be generated from silent clips. Split-viewing Split-viewing is an information gap activity where the class is split into groups with one group facing the screen and the other with their back to the screen. The ones facing the screen than report on what they have seen - this can be done WHILE as well as AFTER they watch. Alternatively, students who are not watching (the ones sitting with their backs to the screen) can be send out of the classroom and come up with a list of the questions to ask the 'watching group'. This works particularly well with action or crime scenes with