Skip to main content

Colligation and a bottom-up approach to grammar


Summary of Hugh Dellar's IATEFL webinar Following the patterns: colligation and the necessity of a bottom-up approach
to grammar - September 2015







For most people,
the Lexical Approach is about focusing more on vocabulary in general and collocations in particular. Personally, however, I
have always thought that the crux of the Lexical Approach is a different
approach to teaching grammar. Lewis himself acknowledges that the Lexical
approach “means giving attention to a much wider range of patterns which
surround individual words […] In this respect, it is a more ‘grammatical’
approach than the traditional structural syllabus“ (2000:149-150, author’s
emphasis).










Hugh Dellar,
co-author of the only two coursebook series that incorporate the Lexical
Approach – Innovations and, to a lesser extent, Outcomes, has shown in his books how this, lexico-grammatical approach can be put in practice. In his IATEFL webinar,
he brought in theoretical evidence from J.H. Firth and Michael Hoey to drive his point home. It was Firth who
introduced the terms collocation and colligation in the 1960s,
but, while the former has gained currency in ELT (especially in recent years), the latter hasn't been embraced by the profession, despite extensive research of the phenomenon carried out by Hoey (see Hoey's accessible article on the topic on OneStopEnglish). 





Put simply, if collocation
is a lexical company of a word, colligation is its grammatical company. For
example, verbs of perception, such as hear, notice, see, watch,
tend to be followed by an object and an -ing clause: I heard you
coming in late last night. I saw him playing live when I was in Belgrade. Another
example Hugh gave was the expression “to stand the test of time” which
colligates (i.e. likes the company of) the Present Perfect as in: “…has
stood the test of time”.





However, Hugh
took a wider view of colligation, extending the term beyond the
situations where a particular word prefers a certain grammatical structure to also
include cases where a failure to follow the pattern associated with a word
would result in error. Some examples of learner errors which Hugh showed are:





*I am agree


*It is depend of
my girlfriend


*I feel myself
sad


*He wants that I
study law


*How does she
look?





As such, these
are not grammar errors, but rather what Hugh referred to as “micro-grammatical
problems” caused by a lack of awareness of how the words agree, depend,
feel etc. interact with grammar. For example, students may have learnt
the meaning of “depend” but have not factored in the pattern attached to the
word. As a result, they speak L2 in L1 bringing in primings (a term
coined by Hoey) from L1. 





One of the participants of the webinar, Sharon Hartle, a teacher trainer whom I met at last year's TESOL Italy convention (do check out her blog!), gave this example of a pattern her Italian-speaking students often transfer from L1:





"I have the possibility to... (do smth)"


This is instead of using "can" which would be a more appropriate choice in English. "Possibility", on the other hand, is likely to attract the following colligational patterns:





there is (no) possibility that 


or


the possibility of


See how Oxford Learners' Dictionary highlights colligations of "possibility" HERE





Such micro-grammatical
problems lie outside the realm of the traditional pedagogical grammar which
places (undue) emphasis on the sentence-level grammar (aka the Big Grammar). Hugh Dellar remarked that believing that the
Big Grammar is the cause of the above mistakes is to
miss the point. 





The main takeaway
from the webinar was that teachers should be doing more than providing
definitions and synonyms when teaching vocabulary, and that grammar work should
start with exploring patterns associated with words (hence, a more bottom-up
approach to grammar). Because students
lack exposure to – and awareness of – how words interact with grammar in
English, it is important to reformulate students' output and provide good, natural examples. When correcting students’ mistakes teachers should resist the temptation to focus on 'big' grammar issues (e.g. tenses) and explore instead word grammar or colligations. To see how mistakes with the third person singular can be treated lexically - see my post HERE 







Hugh Dellar also stressed
the importance of comparing and contrasting with L1, where appropriate, a topic
which generated a lively debate and lead to many stimulating questions from
more than 200 participants that attended the thought-provoking webinar. I was
surprised that quite a few teachers, despite recent research, were still anti-L1
and made comments along the lines of "resorting to L1 may impede acquisition of L2". See my
previous post The return of translation












IATEFL offers monthly webinars; these are available to members as well as non-members. For a list of upcoming webinars, see HERE.





For a summary of Quizlet – more than just flashcards webinar which I gave in January 2015, click HERE or HERE 




References



Lewis, M. (ed.) (2000). Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach. Boston: Thomson-Heinle

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Benefits Of Healthy eating Turmeric every day for the body

One teaspoon of turmeric a day to prevent inflammation, accumulation of toxins, pain, and the outbreak of cancer.  Yes, turmeric has been known since 2.5 centuries ago in India, as a plant anti-inflammatory / inflammatory, anti-bacterial, and also have a good detox properties, now proven to prevent Alzheimer's disease and cancer. Turmeric prevents inflammation:  For people who
Post a Comment
Read more

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that
Post a Comment
Read more

Not a word was spoken (but many were learned)

Video is often used in the EFL classroom for listening comprehension activities, facilitating discussions and, of course, language work. But how can you exploit silent films without any language in them? Since developing learners' linguistic resources should be our primary goal (well, at least the blogger behind the blog thinks so), here are four suggestions on how language (grammar and vocabulary) can be generated from silent clips. Split-viewing Split-viewing is an information gap activity where the class is split into groups with one group facing the screen and the other with their back to the screen. The ones facing the screen than report on what they have seen - this can be done WHILE as well as AFTER they watch. Alternatively, students who are not watching (the ones sitting with their backs to the screen) can be send out of the classroom and come up with a list of the questions to ask the 'watching group'. This works particularly well with action or crime scenes with
Post a Comment
Read more