Skip to main content

How to Make Yourself a Better Trader, Right Now

How can you make yourself a better trader, right here, right now?

Per Coach Knight's observation, take a hard look at your trading results and identify the one kind of market you most hate, the one that is hardest for you to make money.  Perhaps its a quiet market with little movement; perhaps it's a market that has already moved quite a bit.  Perhaps it's a particular asset class or time frame.  Identify where you really are a poor trader with no edge.

That is what you're meant to work on.

You work on your weak trading not because that's where you should put your eggs in the future, but because the weak areas of trading reveal the vulnerabilities that eventually will dog you in your bread-and-butter trading.  The chain of your trading success is ultimately only as strong as its weakest link.

But, wait, you say:  Aren't we supposed to be focusing on our strengths and making the most of those?  

Of course you want to build on your strengths, and that is your path to growth.  The creative challenge of making yourself better is to figure out how to leverage your strongest trading to improve your greatest areas of weakness.  Somehow, in some way, your best trading holds the key to what you need to be doing in the markets that give you the most trouble.

I don't mind sharing that I took a bit of a butt-kicking this past week in my trading.  Nothing dire--each loss was small--but most my trades lost!  My win rate on trades so far this year has been close to 70%, so a week like the one past stands out as a fail.  So what went wrong?

My strength lies in synthesizing data:  looking at many measures of market strength/weakness and buying/selling and organizing my observations into a cycle-based conceptual framework.  It's when multiple measures of flows come together and fit into a pattern that I'm most likely to place winning trades.  The key to such trading is waiting for everything to line up.  I don't find good trades; they come to me when I'm patient and maintain an open mind.

So what happens in a slow market such as we've had in US stocks?  Everything moves s-l-o-w-e-r and it takes l-o-n-g-e-r for things to line up.  But did my trading slow down?  Hell, no!  I simply moved to faster time frames and looked for things to line up on a near term basis.  In other words, I adjusted my trading so that I could trade; I didn't adjust for opportunity!

Look, I've been trading since the late 1970s.  I have a doctoral degree in psychology, and I've worked with more traders than I can count.  I literally study markets every day.  And still, at times, I can trade like an imbecile.  Weaknesses break through, whether they are shortcomings in my psychology or my trading methods.  Good trading is not about always trading well; it's about identifying and addressing weaknesses quickly and drawing upon strengths to remedy those.

Guaranteed, this weekend I'll be studying my best trades and then seeing how often those patterns set up in slow markets.  That will guide my trading this week.  Every setback has a purpose: to make you stronger.  But that can only occur if you're willing to look setbacks in the face, accept them, and learn from them.

Further Reading:  Trading With Your Brain--And Your Gut
.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...
Post a Comment
Read more

Terrifying Arctic methane levels

A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...
Post a Comment
Read more