Skip to main content

Can Successful Trading Be Taught?

Can successful trading be taught?  Consider this excellent post from Bella at SMB, describing what the folks at SMB have learned from the training and mentoring of successful traders.  That post rings true for me, because I personally know (and have worked with) most of the traders Bella speaks about.  I have observed their development and can vouch for the qualities that have made them winners.

What is clear from my observations and experience is that patterns that have a positive edge in trading can be identified and taught.  What is also clear is that learning those patterns doesn't become successful trading until those patterns are truly internalized.  The many hours of study and performance review serve one important purpose:  taking a pattern that is "out there" and becoming so familiar with it that you learn to feel it internally.  

Consider raising a child from birth.  At first, you're a clumsy parent, trying to figure out what the baby needs, reading through parenting guides, and reacting and overreacting to every cry.  Gradually, you begin to read your baby...one cry is different from another...one kind of holding and rocking works, another doesn't.  As you gain intimate experience with that child, you develop a feel for parenting.  You get to the point where you can anticipate your baby's needs in real time.

There is no way of achieving that kind of parenting skill and success without having plenty of baby time.  It's not uncommon to see fathers struggle with knowing what to do with their babies simply because they have been so busy at work that they haven't spent the kind of intimate baby time that gives them a feel for their child's needs.  

It is very similar in markets.  Screen time is what gives us the intimacy with patterns that enables us to internalize them.  You can teach a pattern to three different traders and you can teach parenting skills to three different parents.  Ultimately, it will be the trader and parent who cultivates repeated, intimate experience that is most likely to turn the information from teaching into lived performance skills.

Bella says something interesting in this regard:  it is not unusual for a trader to not be successful in their first year.  It is often several years before the new trader can become a meaningfully profitable trader.  Deliberate practice takes time.  The best traders find a trading niche that exploits their talents, derive a passionate interest from their work as a result, use that passionate energy to drive their practice and review, and accelerate their learning curves as a result.  But there always is a significant learning curve, with plenty of bumps along the way.

Medical school is a structured training process, honed over years of research and practice.  The new medical student starts with classroom learning (anatomy, physiology, pathology), moves to learning interview skills (how to take a history and physical), then moves to shadowing and assisting practicing physicians across different specialties, then takes on more responsibility within a specialty of their choice under close supervision and mentoring.  No one expects a first year med student to conduct a surgical procedure; by the end of their undergraduate training, they are actively working in the OR as part of a surgical team.

What I've seen among trading firms that are successful in growing talent is that they operate very much like medical schools.  They teach information, they embed new students in teams and encourage learning from a mentor, and they encourage students to specialize in areas that speak to their interests and talents.  That is the process that Bella describes, and it is an excellent example of how talent can grow through properly structured apprenticeship.

Further Reading:  Can Individual Traders Succeed in Today's Markets?
.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...

Terrifying Arctic methane levels

A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...