Skip to main content

Creativity and Innovation: The Achilles Heel of Trading and Trading Psychology

I've spent a chunk of time this morning reading what's out there in social media regarding trading, trading psychology, and trading methods.  A lot of sites, a lot of tweets.  A lot of what I read boils down to, "Once you've found your edge, stay consistent in your mental/emotional state and in your trading practices."

Why is it that so many professional money managers (not to mention individual traders) fail to meet performance expectations?

I would argue that the reason is that they have followed their own advice.  They found their edge, they stayed consistent with it, and they have been left behind as markets have changed.  In other words, traders have failed because there is much, much more to trading psychology than maintaining emotional control and following routines.

Successful traders and trading firms create and innovate--just like any successful business.  They operate in a dynamic environment and they find ways to adapt and exploit *new* sources of edge as the marketplace evolves.  The Achilles heel of trading psychology is that it emphasizes the process of trading and not the process of generating fresh ideas worth trading.

Creativity and innovation begin by looking at new information, questioning old assumptions, and using the new information to explore alternate assumptions. 

Here's an example from my recent trading:  What if backtesting a historical set of data is *not* the best way of determining the odds of a market moving from point A to point B?  What if a better predictor is the recent behavior of market participants at points A and B?  

The new data consists of very short-term readings of the upticks and downticks occurring among all exchange-listed stocks throughout the day.  (Available via e-Signal).  Instead of arraying the uptick/downtick data by time, we array it by price level:  we look at each price and how much net upticking/downticking has occurred at that price.  (Note that this is similar to arraying volume by price in a Market Profile).  

What we find is that there are certain price levels and ranges at which buying (upticking) and selling (downticking) has been dominant.  Perhaps these price levels/ranges represent where the inventory lies in markets.  Perhaps the odds of moving through a given price/range is a function of that inventory.

Maybe yes, maybe no; I have an open mind.  What I do know is that this is a different way of looking at markets and modeling forward returns.  I don't know if any given innovation will yield an edge, but I am convinced that the failure to innovate will allow any possible pre-existing edge to erode.

Looking at new information.  Questioning old assumptions.  Asking new questions.  Viewing markets from different angles.  These lie at the heart of what I call Trading Psychology 2.0.  The challenge isn't simply to succeed, but to sustain success.

Further Reading:  Creativity is the New Discipline
.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...
Post a Comment
Read more

Terrifying Arctic methane levels

A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...
Post a Comment
Read more