Skip to main content

The True Reason Psychology Is Central To Trading

Traders have an enduring interest in psychology because they recognize the degree to which success requires change.  This occurs at two levels.  First, most fundamentally, markets behave in ways that run counter to normal human biases and tendencies.  If we simply follow our feelings and sell when markets look scariest and buy when they are most euphoric, we will lose money with alarming consistency.  If we seek the comfort of the herd and buy when others are optimistic and sell when they are pessimistic, we similarly court negative returns.  To trade markets successfully, we must wire ourselves as markets are wired--and that requires changes in how we think and feel.

A second level at which change is central to trading is that markets themselves are always changing.  Sometimes we observe momentum in markets; other times we experience mean reversion within trading ranges.  Sometimes markets are volatile and we can harvest large moves.  Other times, volatility is low and we must take what markets give us.  If we simply had to rewire ourselves to fit markets once and for all, that would be challenging enough.  To rewire ourselves as markets continually change requires unusual flexibility--and a capacity for continuous change.

This, most fundamentally, is why psychology is important to trading.  In adapting to markets, we must continually adapt.  We must change at a pace no slower than markets themselves change--or we will be left behind.

Once we realize the importance of change to trading success--and the need for relatively rapid and continuous change--the crucial question becomes, "How do we effect change?  How do we adapt ourselves to ever-changing environments?"

I address this issue in my most recent posting for Forbes.  It is little appreciated that there is a deep research literature on human change processes.  It goes relatively unnoticed to the general public because it has been conducted under the umbrella of outcome research in psychotherapy and counseling.  The study of how people make changes in therapy--and how they sustain those changes--has become a central theme of that outcome literature.  As the Forbes article makes clear, we change, not by motivating ourselves or trying to talk ourselves into thinking or behaving differently, but by absorbing new life experience.  

Do you wish to become a more patient trader?  You can write in your journal, and you can attach sticky-note reminders to your screen, but ultimately you will become a patient trader when you experience yourself as a patient person.  That means using your non-trading life to cultivate patience, placing yourself in roles that push you to be the patient person you wish to become.  Perhaps your child is having trouble with math in school and you can act as a patient tutor.  Perhaps your home needs curb appeal and you can grow and maintain a garden.  Doing things with patience, one small step at a time, builds the patient identity.  So it is with all the changes we seek to make.

We will never become greater risk-takers in markets if we approach life with risk aversion.  We will never be organized and disciplined in trading if we are scattered in our daily lives.  Everything in life, approached properly, is an opportunity to exercise the capacities we most require in our trading.  This is how becoming a better trader is a path to becoming a better person.

If we can move one stone at a time, make one small change here and now and another one the next day and yet another the next, before long we will have moved a mountain.  What the research on change tells us unequivocally is that we change when we internalize new ways of doing and viewing and we internalize those new ways through repeated, fresh experience.  Every day is an opportunity to move a stone, in our trading, in our relationships, in our lives.  We can become the best traders possible by cultivating trading strengths in our personal lives.

Further Reading:  The Most Powerful Change Technique Of All
.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...

Terrifying Arctic methane levels

A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...