Skip to main content

Criticism of the Lexical Approach




"All chunks and no pineapple?"

Image by Andrew Malone via Flickr [CC BY 2.0]

Writing an essay or working on a paper on the Lexical Approach and looking to include some sources that criticise it to make your writing balanced? I've collated a list of relevant articles here.










Like all other methods and approaches in ELT, the Lexical Approach has not been without its critics. Here are some articles (in chronological order) that have been critical or sceptical of the Lexical Approach or some of its aspects over the years.






For a list of useful references on the Lexical Approach: click HERE





Scott Thornbury - Lexical Approach: a journey without maps



One of the first criticisms expressed about the Lexical Approach, particularly Michael Lewis's over-reliance on Krashen's view of language acquisition and a lack of guiding principles for building a syllabus. 





Interestingly, Scott Thornbury would go on to write Natural Grammar (OUP 2005), the only lexical grammar book on the market, although it is probably influenced more by Dave Willis's Lexical Syllabus rather than Lewis's work.





Citation: Thornbury, S. (1998). Lexical Approach: A journey without maps? Modern English Teacher 7:7-13


Can be accessed via Scott Thornbury's website: www.scottthornbury.com/articles.html







Seth Lindstromberg - My good-bye to the Lexical Approach


Coming from the perspective of Cognitive Linguistics, Lindstromberg argues against a strong version of the LA, whose proponents downplay the importance of meaning at the word level (they argue that words as such are devoid of meaning without context).



But... see Hanna Kryzsweska's reply - "Why I won’t say good-bye to the Lexical Approach" written with a non-native speaking teacher in mind. Also, Seth Lindstromberg would later co-author "Teaching Chunks of Language" (Hebling Languages 2009). Not a good-bye after all?



Citation: Lindstromberg, S. (2003). My good-bye to the Lexical Approach. Humanising Language Teaching 5(2)









Michael Swan - Chunks in the classroom: Let’s not go overboard


Here's the quote which pretty much sumps up Michael Swan's 'pro-grammar' stance: "Much of the language we produce is formulaic, certainly; but the rest has to be assembled in accordance with the grammatical patterns of language [...]. If these patterns are not known, communication beyond the phrase-book level is not possible - as somebody memorably put it, language becomes 'all chunks but no pineapple'"

I've always thought the memorable pineapple quote was by Swan himself. Not so, it seems.



Citation: Swan, M. (2006). Chunks in the classroom: Let’s not go overboard. Teacher Trainer, 20(3): 5-6

Can be accessed on Michael Swan's website: www.mikeswan.co.uk/elt-applied-linguistics/chunks-in-the-classroom.htm






Ivor Timmis - The Lexical Approach is dead: long live the lexical dimension! 


Despite what the title claims, the article is not so much criticism but an attempt to explain why the Lexical Approach has not gained wide acceptance in ELT and how its elements can still be effectively incorporated into syllabi and coursebooks.



Citation: Timmis, I (2008). The Lexical Approach may be dead, we should add a lexical dimension to our teaching. Modern English Teacher 17(3): 5-10

Can also be previewed HERE






Catherine Walter - Time to stop avoiding grammar


Criticism of the Lexical approach in the popular (non-professional) press. Catherine Walter defends explicit teaching of grammar rules and, by virtue of it, dismisses the approaches and methods that place less emphasis on it.



See my reply on THIS BLOG or in MET



Citation: Walter, C. (2012, September 18). Time to stop avoiding grammar. The Guardian Weekly. Available at: http://gu.com/p/3aa24






Pawel Scheffler - Lexical priming and explicit grammar in foreign language instruction


Scheffler's main argument is that lexically rich input is not sufficient - indeed EFL learners do not have access to massive exposure like native speakers  - and learners need explicit grammar teaching too.



See Chris Jones's response in ELT Journal



Citation: Scheffler, P. (2015). Lexical priming and explicit grammar in foreign language instruction. ELT Journal 69(1), 93–6







In recent years, Geoffrey Jordan has emerged as a vociferous critic of the Lexical Approach, particularly of Hugh Dellar's work, but also of Michael Hoey's Lexical Priming theory which underpins it. Unfortunately, he has taken his blog down. I'm told you can access some of his posts via this automatic web-archiving tool (WARNING: intemperate language).





That's about it. Have I left anything out?





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...
Post a Comment
Read more

Terrifying Arctic methane levels

A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...
Post a Comment
Read more