Skip to main content

Trading Notes, Week of January 11, 2016

Friday, January 15th

*  Thursday's rally was short-lived, and that has been the outstanding feature of the recent downturn in the stock market.  As noted in the prior posting (below), we have stayed oversold for far longer than has been typical of corrections in 2014 and 2015.  The weakness in oil continued overnight and we've broken to new lows for the move following the data release this morning.  Selling bounces that roll over at lower price highs continues to be the winning strategy.

*  The chart below of one of my primary cycle measures is worth a thousand words.  Quite simply, this is a different cycle from those of the past two years and suggests to me that we've entered a different regime.  Using patterns from the recent past to extrapolate into the near-term future is hazardous to our wealth.




Wednesday, January 13th

*  Tuesday was the first day in which we saw the number of stocks making fresh new lows decline day over day.  To this point, it has been quite a broad decline, with fewer than 10% of SPX stocks trading above their 50-day moving averages and only about a quarter of the stocks trading above their 200-day moving averages.  Indeed, yesterday was the first day in nearly two weeks in which we've seen more than half of stocks closing above their 3-day moving averages.  That is unusually consistent weakness and is but one of the things leading me to believe that this is more than a mere correction in a bull market.

*  Below is a breadth measure I keep for SPX stocks, capturing the percentages closing above short-term moving averages (data from Index Indicators).  We can see that we have stayed oversold far longer than is usual in a normal correction.


*  Yet another look at market weakness is a running total of buy vs. sell signals for all NYSE stocks across various technical measures, such as Bollinger Bands (data from Stock Charts).  The quality of the bounce we can muster from these oversold levels will tell us a lot about whether this is part of a multi-year range or a first leg in a larger bear market move.  My cycle measures are at lower levels than we have seen during recent corrective moves, which once again opens my thinking to the possibility that we are in a different regime, not the rangy corrective mode of much of 2014 and 2015.  



Monday, January 11th

*  What is the secret behind the energy level of extraordinary performers?  This article tackles this most important topic.  Success is not about controlling your emotions, but rather channeling them toward ever-greater achievement.

*  Late weakness in U.S. stock index futures on Friday spilled over to early overnight trading before a reversal in European hours.  We are now quite oversold, with fewer than 10% of SPX shares trading above their 3, 5, 10, 20, and 50-day moving averages.  (Data from Index Indicators). Interestingly, where this broad weakness has occurred for the first time in a month (7 occasions since 2006), the market posted a lower daily close in all seven occasions within a five-day period.  Five of the occasions, however, posted a higher daily close within two trading sessions, with four of the five exceeding 1.5%.  Bottom line is that I'm prepared for two-way action and for volatility, with VIX closing Friday above 27.

*  One of my favorite overbought/oversold measures is in oversold territory, but note that the lows at October, 2014 and August, 2015 occurred at even more oversold levels.  Just because we're oversold doesn't necessarily mean we're at a bottom.  I prefer to stay open-minded.


*  Back to those seven occasions in which we saw fewer than 10% of SPX stocks trading above their 3, 5, 10, 20, and 50-day moving averages.  The dates in which those occurred included September and November, 2008; May and June, 2010; and August, 2011.  In all those occasions, we saw bounces but further price lows over coming months.  A major call traders need to make here is whether we're currently seeing a correction in a bull market or the unfolding of a bear.  I'm open to the latter and will be watching closely for the quality of bounces from here.
.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...

Terrifying Arctic methane levels

A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...