Skip to main content

UN... since measurements began in 1850!

"Unprecedented climate extremes marked last decade, says UN"

UN... OK lets go through this one more time.

If you are desperate to prove your point it is not unreasonable to use extremely selective or even contrived data. It is not a new strategy... it is commonplace in fact. Most points can be proven with selective data or contrived data, no mystery there.

We are onto you OK. Stop with the charade! Collapse already!

Your attempt to greenwash the truth is pathetic!

If nothing else... most if not all things originated out of the UN are an affront to intelligence, sometimes your rationale is somewhat humorous such as making crooked cucumbers illegal to sell, or declaring water does not aid in dehydration--but your eugenics/social re engineering/wealth concentration plan known as Agenda 21 is not remotely funny, it is simply horrific. 

The UN insanity must be stopped... it is the originating source of most if not all our debilitating socioeconomic symptoms! Regardless who or what may be behind it all. It is the instrument of NWO subjugation! Those that would aid and abet this travesty are no less than sell-out sycophants or perhaps even worse... Take note of your politicos who further this crime against humanity... resist them!

Your contrived data... such as your magical world population counting clock and your upside down CO2 charts are infantile and quite frankly less than amateurish. Recruiting the famous and qualified to shill for you eventually backfires.
Humans: the real threat to life on Earth
If population levels continue to rise at the current rate, our grandchildren will see the Earth plunged into an unprecedented environmental crisis (based on what? Oh yes! The magic population clock, silly me.)
You may have mainstream screaming out your uncontested press releases, but we have the growing audience and the quizzing minds. We also have connectivity and sharing... it is interactive and powerful, be mindful of that. Greater than you have been toppled by tweets.

Ecoscam: The False Prophets of Ecological Apocalypse (Recommended reading.)

Cyclic climate change should not be confused with another topic, Ecological Spoiling and Ruination. This is another UN tactic designed to shelter corporate recklessness while garnering support from the shallow minded, ill-informed, doe eyed greenie set. It is a total misrepresentation and redirection.

If the point being proved happens to be irrelevant in the scheme of things then fine, go ahead and average and crunch your dedicated little black heart out and feel entirely smug when your hypothesis remains unchallenged.

It is when your business case and your attempts to execute them has a drastic negative impact on humanity... then you need to do better or you will be fingered!

Declaring fictitious emergencies such as CO2 and World overpopulation to justify your peculiar brand of democide and genocide, or to amass wealth for yourselves and your cronies is so far below despicable... I don't even have a word for it.

Climate change is a 'big business opportunity for the UK and elsewhere... (no more clues please...)

You have committed yourselves to eventually receiving wrath the likes of which are going to astound you. 

It may not seem so this minute, but as each day goes by your foundation of corruption, lies and deceit are crumbling like dollar store luggage on a wild buggy ride. Your days are numbered, your jig is up!

I am but one voice, but there are many.

As your concoctions proliferate so do we... but it is the absurdity of your campaigns which will consume you and your paid abettors and shills at the end of day.

Our duty is but to point out your evil intent and lay bare your lies. Yes, I am a pacifist type and no I will never raise a finger, but I will keep alarming til the cows come home, that you can chart.

This is a recent UN/NWO announcement, It is typically deceitful--please review it with a critical eye.

First comes the OMG statement...

"Unprecedented climate extremes marked last decade, says UN"
(Unprecedented means never before experienced in the annals of planet history)...

Next comes the selective data...

"UN World Meteorological Organization analysis of rainfall and temperatures between 2001 and 2010 says decade was warmest since measurements began in 1850"
(The selective part is self evident)

Using UN logic - climate was a steady state condition prior to our ability to measure it a few years back. Presumably before 1850 the climate is seen by them as either static or cooperative for their purpose or is simply irrelevant. 

Note... on the real world charts of climate undulations, we are currently on the cusp of leaving an ice age, the projection indicates a predictable warming is in order.  We appear to be in order.



UN... excuse me... we do get planetary climate shifting, climates shift on ALL planets, that's what they do--always have and always will.

It is why we have traditionally demarked climate periods and called them "ages." Nowhere is there a decree cancelling natural shifts, unless of course your UN stooge King Canute is at it again. You may have it filed under crooked cucumbers...

Strangely, when convenient you do apparently have data prior to 1850.
Global-average atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide rose to 389 parts per million in 2010, 39% higher than at the start of the industrial era in 1750. Methane rose to 1,808.0 parts per billion (158%) and nitrous oxide to 323.2 ppb (20%).
The rest of the article can be read at the link if you wish to play into the thinly disguised innuendo's, implied reasons for change and the pending justification for penalizing us because we breath.

Eventually these type of reports are used as the justification for all sorts of insanity based agenda's. The solution we will use is free and its called adaptation, its been the tradition for centuries.

What we have here is simple basic media conditioning propaganda...

It gets old real fast...


Stay tuned....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...

Terrifying Arctic methane levels

A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...