Skip to main content

Cap those volcanoes! Ignore the release of nuclear waste.

New World Order governance sweeps into office promising to turn back the oceans and heal the planet with their climate change policy, usually some scam involving selling, trading, bartering carbon units as though they were a commodity on the stock market.


The intent is not to suppress man made exhaust, but to tax it, to have it as a featured profit center. The topic is also used to justify various democide ploys under various eugenics agendas.

Watch Out for the Green Team

The "green" debate is nothing if not lively.

It is one of the debates I loathe to participate in, along with religion, politics and MAC -v- PC. These debates are always fruitless consuming both time and energy and never end well.

The main problem I see with the Climate Change debate, is it mixes two very different concerns and so compounds and confuses participants.

The debate thrust is about preserving life on the planet and greenhouse gas is elevated to be the elephant in the room. Of course the eye of well meaning folk go to where directed.

There is a FAR more lethal aspects you seldom hear discussed.
  • One element of debate is the effect of human activity regarding greenhouse emissions leading to global warming.
  • The second (largely ignored) IMMEDIATE threat to life... is the ill advised poisoning of the environment through releasing toxic and lethal substances into the food and water supply.
The first condition is said to affect the climate over time, the second condition absolutely harms everything in the food chain immediately.

Yet the climate change debate hogs the "green" debate stage front and center, why?

    Unfortunately the debate is redirected to the almost benign effects of carbon release as being the whole threat to life on the planet--steered by the individuals who profit from the real issue - release of lethal, toxic, noxious substances into the food chain, in the name of profiteering. 

    This real immediate killer is never cited in the climate change debate, it is a dirty little secret swept under the rug, meanwhile... nuclear waste, oil spills, GMO foods and sundry other deadly industrial wastes and effluents are routinely poured into the immediate environment with catastrophic result--without anyone in governance promising anything in the way of remedial action for your protection.

    In fact... most of the reckless, wanton and destructive behaviour is condoned or at least sanctioned through permit approvals, turning of blind eyes and so forth.

    The "greenies" may be barking up the wrong tree. "Greenies" should probably review their priorities.

    Climate shift is inevitable whilst premeditated, unconcionable poising of the environment is not. 


    About Climate Shift.

    Climates are dynamic not static, climates shift, that's what they do, always have and always will.

    It is why we call them "ages".
    No! Cyclic climate events will not lock into a "sweet spot" for your convenience, No! Governance will not apply a super duper climate control knob to dial "good" climates in, no matter how much tax you pay. Yes! The alarming advertised human population growth is entirely contrived.


    As life has done for millennia, adaptation to shifting climates is the key, not capping volcanoes.
    Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans.
    "Human additions of CO2 to the atmosphere must be taken into perspective.
    Over the past 250 years, humans have added just one part of CO2 in 10,000 to the atmosphere.
    One volcanic cough can do this in a day." (Ian Plimer)
    This is what’s called negative feedback with at least some of the increasing levels of carbon dioxide being absorbed by extra plant growth. It could also be good news for biodiversity, and good news for food security: plants are the primary producers that feed all animals.
    I am not trying to support the climate shift sceptics, as stated already... climate shift is immutable and cannot be denied, what can be denied is the primary causal motivation for them which is 98% natural sources.

    It is probable the universal laws of equillibrium and ballance will provide natural checks and balance to atmospheric composition, science indicates that is happening.

    In conclusion, until I see really sincere resistance to routine industrial poisoning, agricultural genetic meddling, proper management of nuclear wastes, curtailment of wind turbines, Fracking and other obvious immediate threats to life on the planet I will remain a sceptic of any government claim they are engaged in preservation of anything, except perhaps their own politico survival and sponsors pocket books.

    The Cult of Catastrophe-Just Trust & Suck It Up!

    If you are a rabid supporter in the climate change endless loop debate, I am suspicious as to your motivation, your intent may be well founded but be careful of being used, the NWO technique is called redirection.

    Are you in fact inadvertently supporting... Volunteered Self Extermination - Our new "Normal."

    And the Earth Cried... at least cast a glance over here... each of these and all the others was preventable..

    ... as are the many more to come. 

    But only if we allow them to allow that!

    Top 10 Environmental Disasters
    • Chernobyl
    • Bhopal
    • Kuwaiti Oil Fires
    • Love Canal
    • The Exxon Valdez
    • Tokaimura Nuclear Plant
    • The Aral Sea
    • Seveso Dioxin Cloud
    • Minamata Disease
    • Three Mile Island
    Over 500 atmospheric nuclear weapons tests were conducted at various sites around the world from 1945 to 1980, what do you suppose that may have done?

    I will take burps of CO2 anyday of the week over these, how about you?






    Stay tuned...

    Labels:

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

    The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Terrifying Arctic methane levels

    A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Women and children overboard

    It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more