Skip to main content

Engineers Do It Forever

I read an interesting article on The Verge today (Photoshop is a city for everyone), which detailed a short history of Photoshop, to explain why it is the way it is, and how it will continue to be that way.



I enjoyed the article, but one quote in there bugged me:


"Many of the Adobe employees I met — all fantastic conversationalists — seem like the sort of people whose children grow up to become employees of Google. You know, smart people who’ve had their own heyday, and are now ready for the next generation to shine.”

The quote felt more personal to me because I’ve worked at Adobe (albeit not on Photoshop), as well as other venerable tech companies in Silicon Valley, and now find myself at Google.



What irks me is this: Just because an engineer has some level of success, or got the chance to work on a successful product in some previous generation, doesn’t have any bearing on whether they want to let someone else do it. In fact, I’d argue the opposite: any engineer that has worked on ground-breaking, cool stuff will continue to want to do so. You don’t reach a point in your career and think, “Okay, that’s enough.” Or at least, I don’t think you do if you honestly give a crap about what you’re working on, which is the case with most of the people with whom I’ve had the honor to work.



The fact that you’ve done great stuff in the past means you want to do it again. And again. And again.



Sure, there’s probably a time in life where you just get really, really tired. Or dead. But until that time, how the Hell could you live and work in a place and an industry like this and not continue trying to do amazing new things? Case in point: the article’s author interviewed someone that worked on the original version of Photoshop, and then more recently invented Lightroom during a summer vacation. That doesn’t sound like someone that was ready to let that next generation take over. Or maybe he just didn't have any kids to hand it over to?



Maybe this is just me mis-reading the author’s intention here, but it seemed worth clarifying this for posterity, or at least for myself:

Engineers do what we do because we love doing it, not because it pays the bills. So excuse us while we continue doing it until they pry our cold, dead fingers off our keyboards.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Benefits Of Healthy eating Turmeric every day for the body

One teaspoon of turmeric a day to prevent inflammation, accumulation of toxins, pain, and the outbreak of cancer.  Yes, turmeric has been known since 2.5 centuries ago in India, as a plant anti-inflammatory / inflammatory, anti-bacterial, and also have a good detox properties, now proven to prevent Alzheimer's disease and cancer. Turmeric prevents inflammation:  For people who
Post a Comment
Read more

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that
Post a Comment
Read more

Not a word was spoken (but many were learned)

Video is often used in the EFL classroom for listening comprehension activities, facilitating discussions and, of course, language work. But how can you exploit silent films without any language in them? Since developing learners' linguistic resources should be our primary goal (well, at least the blogger behind the blog thinks so), here are four suggestions on how language (grammar and vocabulary) can be generated from silent clips. Split-viewing Split-viewing is an information gap activity where the class is split into groups with one group facing the screen and the other with their back to the screen. The ones facing the screen than report on what they have seen - this can be done WHILE as well as AFTER they watch. Alternatively, students who are not watching (the ones sitting with their backs to the screen) can be send out of the classroom and come up with a list of the questions to ask the 'watching group'. This works particularly well with action or crime scenes with
Post a Comment
Read more