Skip to main content

Why The Path Is As Important As The Move



Let's think about the views that traders express.  Traders look for price movement: a change from one level to another level.  That potential movement we could call the numerator; it's what most traders focus upon.

There is another variable, the denominator, that most traders do not focus upon.  The denominator is the path between the first and second price levels.  It is equally important.

Let's do a thought experiment:  I might expect a stock index to move from 2000 to 2100, a 5% move.  Let's say the index remained nearly unchanged in value for six months before shooting higher to 2100 in the seventh month.  How many traders would have stuck with this trade?

Let's consider a different scenario:  The index moves from 2000 to 2100 in one month, but only after having dropped to 1940 in the first week.  How many traders would have stuck with this trade?

The point, of course, is that path matters.  When we expect a movement, we expect it in a certain time period and we expect the path to the target to have a certain degree of smoothness.  Our one concession to path is the establishment of stop levels, but rarely do we think of path as something to investigate in its own right.

Is the path getting smoother or more choppy?  Does the market's level of volatility support the likelihood of the desired move in a shorter or longer time period?  Is that volatility increasing or waning?

In short, it's easy to focus on what markets will do, but not place enough weight about how that movement is likely to occur.  Intellectually, we identify targets and stops, but what impacts us emotionally are paths.  It's easy to prepare for the trade and remain unprepared for the path of the trade.  

At any time frame, we can identify the amount of net movement between two points (how much price has risen or fallen) as a function of the total movement between two points.  Such a measure of trendiness versus choppiness itself waxes and wanes: trendiness is itself a phenomenon that trends.  Placing a trade in a low trending environment--and one where trending itself has been declining--is quite different from placing a trade in a high trending environment in which trending is itself trending. 

Thinking through the denominator is one way we can deploy capital smarter, deciding when environments are right for our ideas and when environments are more conducive to shorter-term, tactical trading and when they are conducive to longer-term, thematic views.

Further Reading:  Why So Many Traders Lose
.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity-A Fancy Word for Destitute.

The reason for this post is not for the folks who have been caught in the first wave of personal economic hard reality, but the next wave. Regardless of the optimism espoused by grinning leaders and sycophant press, we are entering the final stage of global economic collapse. It began in 2008 and was forestalled for five years with fudge putty, but the weight of global indebtedness cannot be propped any longer and the final crunch is imminent. Austerity measures herald the final throes.  Indications of coming austerity.   Austerity measures are the final last ditch effort, futile or not! Back in the day many of us old-timers went through periods of "hard-times". In retrospect I realize there is no comparison to yesteryear hard times and today's version. Back then, expectations were never very high for the working class, there were no sophisticated systems or conveniences anyway. In fact the difference between being "set" or not was about having treats or not. Si...

Terrifying Arctic methane levels

A peak methane level of 3026 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 469 mb on December 11, 2021 am. This follows a peak methane level of  3644 ppb  recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 367 mb on November 21, 2021, pm. A peak methane level of 2716 ppb was recorded by the MetOp-B satellite at 586 mb on December 11, 2021, pm, as above image shows. This image is possibly even more terrifying than the image at the top, as above image shows that at 586 mb, i.e. much closer to sea level, almost all methane shows up over sea, rather than over land, supporting the possibility of large methane eruptions from the seafloor, especially in the Arctic.  Also, the image was recorded later than the image at the top with the 3026 ppb peak, indicating that even more methane may be on the way. This appears to be confirmed by the Copernicus forecast for December 12, 2021, 03 UTC, as illustrated by the image below, which shows methane at 500 hPa (equivalent to 500 mb). Furthermore, ...

Women and children overboard

It's the  Catch-22  of clinical trials: to protect pregnant women and children from the risks of untested drugs....we don't test drugs adequately for them. In the last few decades , we've been more concerned about the harms of research than of inadequately tested treatments for everyone, in fact. But for "vulnerable populations,"  like pregnant women and children, the default was to exclude them. And just in case any women might be, or might become, pregnant, it was often easier just to exclude us all from trials. It got so bad, that by the late 1990s, the FDA realized regulations and more for pregnant women - and women generally - had to change. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) took action too. And so few drugs had enough safety and efficacy information for children that, even in official circles, children were being called "therapeutic orphans."  Action began on that, too. There is still a long way to go. But this month there was a sign that ...